



A DST lawyer represents investors who lost money in Delaware statutory trust investments recommended by a broker or brokerage firm. DSTs are often sold during a 1031 exchange with promises of steady income and tax deferral. When the risks were not explained or the investment did not fit, the claim is brought in FINRA arbitration.
Our DST lawyers at Weltz Law work inside the FINRA dispute resolution forum. FINRA stands for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the organization that oversees brokerage firms and runs the arbitration system for most investor claims.
This page is part of our alternative investment fraud lawyer section, within our broader securities lawyer practice.
Our seasonsed attorneys have over 30 years of collective experience, and our committed to protecting investors rights. Call today or contact us through our site.
☎ Call NowA Delaware statutory trust is a legal entity that owns one or more commercial properties, such as apartments, warehouses, medical offices, or retail centers. Investors buy fractional interests in the trust and receive a share of the rental income. A sponsor company manages everything.
DST real estate lets an investor own a slice of a large property without being a landlord. No tenants to call. No repairs to schedule.
That hands-off structure is the selling point. It is also the catch. DST investors have almost no control. They cannot vote on a sale, change the property manager, or decide when to get out.
DST investments are usually sold as private placements to accredited investors, meaning people who meet certain income or net worth thresholds. They are not traded on any exchange, so there is no easy way to sell an interest before the trust ends.
DST investments are most often sold to people who just sold investment real estate and want to defer taxes. Many are retirees or longtime landlords who are tired of managing tenants. Some inherited property or sold a family farm or business building.
These investors often have a large share of their net worth tied up in one sale. They want income. They want simplicity. And many have never owned a private placement before.
Picture a 72-year-old couple selling the duplex they have rented out for thirty years. They want to stop fixing water heaters. A broker tells them a DST will pay steady monthly income with no hassle. What the broker may not stress is that the money could be locked up for a decade.
That gap between what investors want and what a DST actually delivers is where many claims begin.
DSTs qualify as replacement property in a 1031 exchange, which lets real estate sellers defer capital gains taxes. Because the exchange has strict deadlines, investors are often under pressure to choose a property fast. DSTs are marketed as a quick, ready-made solution.
In a 1031 exchange, an investor generally has 45 days to identify replacement property and 180 days to close. Miss those windows and the tax deferral can be lost.
That clock creates urgency. Someone who just sold a rental property may feel they have to decide within days. A broker who presents a DST as safe, simple, and tax-smart may meet little resistance.
Pressure is not a reason to skip full disclosure. Our page on 1031 exchange investments explains how these exchanges work.
The biggest Delaware statutory trust risks are lack of liquidity, lack of control, and high upfront costs. Reliance on one property or tenant and debt on the property add more risk. Many investors also learn too late that distributions are not guaranteed and can be cut or stopped.
The risks investors raise most often include:
None of these risks make a DST improper on their own. But each one should be clearly explained before an investor puts in money.
Usually not easily. There is no public market for DST interests, and most offering documents allow few or no early exits. The sponsor decides when the property is sold, and investors generally wait until then to get their money out.
Some investors find private buyers, but often at a steep discount. Others simply wait, sometimes years longer than they expected.
For a retiree who needs cash for medical bills or living costs, that lack of access can be a serious problem. It is one of the most important risks a broker should explain before the sale.
DST investments often carry significant upfront costs, including selling commissions, sponsor fees, and offering expenses. Combined, these can take a meaningful share of the investment before the property earns a dollar. Ongoing management and asset fees add more.
Here's the part many investors miss. Those upfront costs come out on day one. The investment has to earn them back before the investor is truly ahead.
Brokers can earn much higher commissions on DSTs than on ordinary investments. That creates pressure to recommend them, which is one reason firms are expected to review these products carefully before offering them.
A broker recommending a DST must reasonably believe it is in the customer's best interest. That means weighing costs, risks, and the customer's full financial picture. The brokerage firm must also perform reasonable due diligence on the DST sponsor and the property before offering it.
That includes looking at the sponsor's history with past programs, the property's financials, the loan terms, and the tenant situation. Skipping that work can support a claim.
The broker must also explain the risks in plain terms. A thick private placement memorandum does not replace an honest conversation. Learn more about investment product due diligence and unsuitable investment claims.
The most common problems involve over-concentration, misrepresented income or safety, poor disclosure of liquidity limits, and recommendations to investors who needed access to their money. Weak due diligence by the brokerage firm often sits underneath all of these.
Patterns our DST lawyers see include:
When older investors are involved, these issues may also raise concerns about financial elder abuse.
Possibly. A DST can still be paying while the investment was unsuitable from the start, or while the underlying property is in trouble. Distributions alone do not show that the recommendation was proper or that the risks were explained.
Some DSTs keep paying for years before problems surface. Others pay out of reserves while rents are falling.
Timing also matters. Waiting until distributions stop can push the original sale closer to the end of the FINRA six-year window.
When a DST property struggles, the sponsor may cut or suspend distributions, delay a sale, or in serious cases lose the property to the lender. Because investors have no control, they often learn about these decisions only after they happen.
Rising interest rates and weaker demand in some property types have put pressure on certain DSTs in recent years. Loans that looked manageable at purchase can become hard to refinance.
That is often when investors first open the offering documents and see the risk factors for the first time. Our DST lawyers look at what those documents said, what the broker said, and how the two compare.
A DST gives investors a beneficial interest in a trust with almost no control. A tenant-in-common interest gives investors direct ownership and voting rights, which can make decisions harder. A non-traded REIT pools many properties into a company that investors own shares in.
All three are illiquid real estate products often sold by brokers. All three can carry high fees. The structure affects what rights investors have and what went wrong.
Learn more on our tenant-in-common investments and REIT pages.
The FINRA eligibility rule generally bars claims filed more than six years after the event that caused the dispute. For DSTs, that event is often the original sale. Because DSTs are long-term holdings, problems can surface close to or after the six-year mark.
A DST sold in a 1031 exchange may pay steadily for five years before trouble starts. By then, the window is nearly closed. State deadlines may also apply and can be shorter.
Our DST lawyers check the purchase dates at the very first review.
Gather the private placement memorandum, subscription agreement, 1031 exchange paperwork, account statements, distribution notices, and every communication with the broker. Together, these show what you bought, what you were told, and what has happened since.
Start with these:
Missing something? The brokerage firm and the sponsor keep their own records, and many can be requested during discovery.
Our DST lawyers start with the offering documents and the story of the sale, then build the claim through each stage of FINRA arbitration. Clients get a clear explanation at every step, from the first review through the final hearing.
The first step is understanding the investment. Our team reviews the property, the loan, the sponsor, and the fees. Then our DST lawyers compare that picture with the investor's age, finances, and need for income or access to cash.
Next, our FINRA arbitration attorneys draft and file the Statement of Claim, the written filing that starts the case.
Discovery follows. Our team requests the firm's due diligence files on the DST, its approval records, and the broker's commission data.
If the case reaches a final hearing, our DST lawyers present the evidence, witnesses, and exhibits to the panel. No one can predict how a panel will rule. The goal is a clear record of what was sold and what was said. Our page on FINRA arbitration explains the full process.
Did a broker put your 1031 exchange proceeds into a DST that turned out riskier than promised? It may be worth a closer look. A conversation with a DST lawyer can help you understand what options may exist.
Our DST lawyers represent investors, retirees, trusts, and families nationwide in FINRA arbitration. Bring your offering documents, exchange paperwork, and a short timeline if you have them. Contact Weltz Law today to talk through what happened.
Fill out the form below or call 877-905-7671 to schedule your free consultation
By Appointment Only
9171 Wilshire Blvd #500
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Attorney Advertising | Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.