



An EcoVest Capital lawyer represents investors who bought EcoVest's syndicated conservation easement deals through a broker. Many were left facing IRS challenges, penalties, or investment losses. When a broker recommended the deal without explaining its risks, the claim may be brought in FINRA arbitration.
Our EcoVest Capital lawyers at Weltz Law work inside the FINRA dispute resolution forum. FINRA stands for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, the organization that oversees brokerage firms and runs the arbitration system for most investor claims.
This page is part of our alternative investment attorney section, within our broader securities lawyer practice.
Our seasonsed attorneys have over 30 years of collective experience, and our committed to protecting investors rights. Call today or contact us through our site.
☎ Call NowEcoVest Capital was an Atlanta-based company that organized and sold interests in syndicated conservation easement deals. Investors bought into a company that owned land. That company then donated a conservation easement on the land and passed a large tax deduction through to the investors.
The pitch was simple. Invest a sum of money near the end of the year, and receive a tax deduction worth several times that amount.
The deduction depended on the appraised value of the development rights given up. The higher the appraisal, the bigger the deduction. That is where the trouble started.
A syndicated conservation easement is a deal where investors buy interests in a company that owns land. The company then donates a permanent restriction on developing that land. The donation creates a charitable tax deduction that is split among the investors.
A conservation easement on its own can be legitimate. Landowners protect farmland, forests, and open space this way every year.
The syndicated version is different. Investors who never owned the land before buy in mainly for the deduction. When the appraisal claims the land was worth far more for development than it really was, the deduction can be inflated many times over.
The IRS has treated many syndicated conservation easement deals as potentially abusive tax shelters since late 2016. In 2022, Congress also limited the deductions many of these partnership deals could claim.
In December 2018, the Justice Department filed a complaint against EcoVest Capital and several individuals. It alleged they promoted conservation easement deals built on grossly overvalued appraisals. The complaint alleged at least 96 syndicates that reported more than $2 billion in improper deductions.
The government asked the court to bar the defendants from organizing, promoting, or selling these deals. It alleged the defendants knew or had reason to know that their statements about tax benefits were false.
In 2023, EcoVest resolved the case with the Justice Department. As reported at the time, EcoVest agreed to stay out of conservation easement programs going forward, without admitting the allegations.
Those were allegations, not findings. But for investors, the bigger issue is often what happened with the IRS on their own tax returns.
Yes. EcoVest was one of many sponsors in this market. The IRS has pursued syndicated conservation easement deals across the country, and some promoters have faced criminal charges and convictions in recent years.
The IRS has challenged many of these deductions in audits and in Tax Court. Investors in deals from other sponsors have faced the same disallowed deductions and penalties as EcoVest investors.
The lessons are the same no matter who sponsored the deal. What did the broker know about the IRS scrutiny, and what did the broker tell the investor?
These investments left investors exposed to IRS audits, disallowed deductions, back taxes, interest, and penalties, on top of possible loss of the money invested. Many investors were not told how aggressively the IRS was challenging these deals.
The main risks included:
For many investors, the tax savings they were promised turned into tax bills they never expected.
These deals were usually sold to high-income professionals and business owners, such as doctors, dentists, executives, and company founders. Many had large tax bills and limited time to plan, which made a large deduction sound appealing.
Picture a physician who just had a strong year and faces a six-figure tax bill in December. A broker calls with a deal that promises a deduction four times the investment. The math looks too good to pass up.
Many of these investors were sophisticated in their own fields. That does not mean they understood appraisal methods or IRS enforcement trends. They relied on the person selling the deal to explain those risks.
Syndicated conservation easement interests were often sold as private placements to high-income, accredited investors looking to cut a large tax bill. Some were sold through brokers, financial advisors, or accountants, often late in the year when tax pressure was highest.
The timing was part of the pitch. An investor facing a big tax bill in December was told they could cut it sharply with one investment.
That urgency made it easier to skip hard questions. How solid was the appraisal? What happens if the IRS says no? What is the real downside?
When a registered broker sold the deal, those questions were not optional. They were part of the broker's job.
Brokers recommending private placements like EcoVest deals had to follow the suitability and best interest standards. Brokerage firms were also expected to perform reasonable due diligence on the sponsor, the offering, and the risks before allowing their brokers to sell it.
For a conservation easement deal, due diligence meant looking at the appraisals, the sponsor's history, and the growing IRS scrutiny of the strategy. For deals sold after late 2016, the red flags were not hidden. The IRS had publicly flagged the strategy.
A broker who described the deduction as safe or certain, or who left out the audit and penalty risk, may have misrepresented the investment. Learn more about investment product due diligence and private placement securities.
EcoVest investors may be able to bring a FINRA claim if a registered broker or brokerage firm recommended or sold them the investment. FINRA arbitration generally applies only to disputes with FINRA member firms and their registered representatives.
If the deal came through an accountant or promoter with no broker involved, FINRA arbitration may not be available. In that case, other paths may exist outside the FINRA forum.
If a broker did sell it, the claim may include misrepresentation, unsuitable recommendation, and failure to perform due diligence. The brokerage firm may also face a failure to supervise claim. If a broker sold the deal outside the firm, a selling away claim may also apply.
Investors dealing with an IRS audit should also work with a qualified tax professional. Our EcoVest Capital lawyers focus on the broker side of the problem.
Warning signs include a deduction promised at four or five times your investment and pressure to invest before year-end. Little discussion of IRS risk and no real explanation of the land value are red flags too. A notice from the IRS questioning the deduction is often the first clear sign.
Look back at how the deal was presented:
Any of these is worth discussing with an EcoVest Capital lawyer.
A FINRA panel can consider the money invested, fees paid, and other financial harm tied to the broker's conduct. Depending on the facts, that may include tax-related harm such as penalties and interest. The panel decides what, if anything, to award.
Conservation easement cases can be more complex than ordinary investment loss cases, because much of the harm comes through the tax system. Investors may face back taxes, penalties, and interest years after the original sale.
Our EcoVest Capital lawyers work to document every category of harm clearly. No one can predict what a panel will award, but a clear record helps the panel see the full picture. Read more on our punitive damages page.
The FINRA eligibility rule generally bars claims filed more than six years after the event that caused the dispute. Many EcoVest deals were sold years ago, so timing is a critical question. State deadlines may also apply and can be shorter.
The problem for many investors is that the harm surfaced late. An IRS audit can take years to reach a final result, and penalties may arrive long after the original sale.
That gap makes early review important. Our EcoVest Capital lawyers look at every relevant date, including the purchase and later events, at the first review.
Gather the offering documents, subscription agreement, appraisal, tax forms, IRS correspondence, and every communication with the broker. These records show what you were told, what you signed, and how the deduction has fared since.
Start with these:
If records are missing, the brokerage firm keeps its own copies, and many can be requested during discovery.
Our EcoVest Capital lawyers start by tracing how the investment was sold and what the broker said about tax risk. Then they build the claim through each stage of FINRA arbitration, with clear explanations for the client at every step.
The first step is the sale itself. Who recommended the deal? Was it sold through the firm? What was said about the IRS and the appraisal?
Next, our team reviews the offering documents and compares them with what the investor was told. Then our FINRA arbitration attorneys draft and file the Statement of Claim, the written filing that starts the case.
Discovery follows. Our team requests the firm's due diligence files on the offering, its approval records, and the broker's commission data.
If the case reaches a final hearing, our EcoVest Capital lawyers present the evidence, witnesses, and exhibits to the panel. No one can predict how a panel will rule. The goal is a clear record of what was sold and what was left out. Our page on FINRA arbitration explains the full process.
Did a broker sell you an EcoVest or other conservation easement deal that led to IRS trouble or losses? It may be worth a closer look. A conversation with an EcoVest Capital lawyer can help you understand what options may exist.
Our EcoVest Capital lawyers represent investors nationwide in FINRA arbitration. Bring your offering documents, tax forms, IRS letters, and a short timeline if you have them. Contact Weltz Law today to talk through what happened.
Our seasonsed attorneys have over 30 years of collective experience, and our committed to protecting investors rights. Call today or contact us through our site.
☎ Call NowFill out the form below or call 877-905-7671 to schedule your free consultation
By Appointment Only
9171 Wilshire Blvd #500
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Attorney Advertising | Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.