



An oil and gas MLP lawyer at Weltz Law represents investors who lost money in master limited partnerships, MLP funds, or MLP ETFs recommended by a broker. MLPs were often sold as steady income investments. When a registered broker made an unsuitable or misleading recommendation, the dispute may belong in FINRA arbitration.
Our oil and gas MLP lawyers work inside the FINRA dispute resolution forum on behalf of investors nationwide. FINRA stands for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. It oversees brokerage firms and runs the arbitration system for most disputes between investors and their brokers.
This page is part of our alternative investment attorney section, within our broader securities lawyer practice.
Our seasonsed attorneys have over 30 years of collective experience, and our committed to protecting investors rights. Call today or contact us through our site.
☎ Call NowA master limited partnership, or MLP, is a business set up as a partnership whose units trade on a stock exchange. Most MLPs operate in energy, especially oil and gas pipelines, storage, and processing. They usually pay quarterly cash distributions and pass income and losses through to investors for tax purposes.
Every MLP has two kinds of partners. The general partner runs the business. The limited partners are the investors, called unitholders, who put up the money.
Because MLPs are partnerships, they generally do not pay corporate income tax. Profits and losses flow to unitholders instead. That tax setup is a big part of their appeal, and also a big source of confusion.
MLPs trade like stocks, so investors can sell on any trading day. That makes them different from non-traded energy partnerships, which are much harder to exit.
When interest rates were low, brokers often pitched energy MLPs as a way to earn higher income with bond-like stability. Pipeline MLPs were described as "toll roads" that earned fees no matter where oil prices went. That story left out real risks tied to energy markets, debt, and distribution cuts.
The toll road idea has some truth to it. Many pipelines earn fees based on volume, not price.
But volume depends on drilling, and drilling depends on price. When oil crashes, producers cut back. Pipeline customers can go bankrupt. MLPs that borrowed heavily to grow can be squeezed hard.
Here's the part many retirees did not hear. A high distribution yield is not a promise. It can be cut, sometimes sharply, when the business struggles.
Oil and gas MLPs suffered steep losses in the 2014 to 2016 oil price collapse and again in 2020. Oil prices fell by more than half in the first downturn. Many MLPs lost a large share of their value, and a number of them cut or suspended distributions.
In 2020, the pandemic sent energy demand into freefall. Some MLP closed-end funds that used borrowed money had to sell holdings at low prices to stay within their borrowing limits. Investors in those funds took losses far larger than the underlying MLPs.
Investors who were told MLPs were safe income found out otherwise. Many had a large share of their savings in the sector when the drops hit.
Brokers sell MLP exposure in several forms. These include individual MLP units, MLP mutual funds, MLP ETFs and exchange-traded notes, and MLP closed-end funds. Each carries the energy risk of MLPs plus its own costs, tax quirks, and structural risks.
The main forms include:
Each layer adds something. Sometimes that is convenience. Sometimes it is more cost and more risk the investor never understood.
Brokers should explain that MLPs are tied to the energy sector and can lose value quickly. MLPs may cut distributions, often carry heavy debt, and come with complex tax reporting. Brokers should also explain the extra risks of MLP funds that borrow money or are taxed as corporations.
Sector risk sits at the top. MLPs tend to rise and fall together, because they share the same energy markets. Owning ten MLPs is not the same as owning a diversified portfolio.
Debt matters too. Many MLPs fund growth with borrowed money and new unit sales. When markets tighten, both sources can dry up at once.
Then come taxes. MLP unitholders get K-1 forms that can arrive late and complicate tax filing. Holding MLPs in an IRA can create its own tax issues. A broker who skips these points may leave the investor with surprises at tax time.
Oil and gas MLP investors may be able to bring a FINRA claim when a registered broker or brokerage firm recommended the investment. The claim focuses on the broker's conduct. That can include an unsuitable recommendation, a misleading description of risk, or too much money in the energy sector.
Energy prices fall for reasons no broker controls. A drop in value alone does not create a claim. The question is whether the recommendation fit the investor and whether the risks were explained honestly.
Claims tied to MLP losses may include unsuitable investment recommendations, misleading information, over-concentration, and failure to supervise.
Over-concentration means putting too much of an investor's money into one investment or one sector. When a broker loaded a portfolio with several energy MLPs or MLP funds, the investor was exposed to one industry. A downturn in oil and gas could then hit most of the portfolio at once.
Picture a retiree with $600,000 who wants income. Her broker spreads $300,000 across six MLPs and an MLP fund. On paper, she owns seven investments. In reality, she owns one bet on energy.
When oil prices collapse, all seven fall together. Distributions shrink just when she needs them. That kind of allocation raises hard questions about suitability.
Brokerage firms are expected to understand MLPs and MLP funds before recommending them. That includes sector risk, debt levels, distribution coverage, tax treatment, and how fund structures add borrowing or tax drag. Firms must also supervise how much energy exposure brokers place in client accounts.
A firm that allows brokers to stack MLP positions in conservative accounts may have a supervision problem. Firm systems should flag heavy sector bets in accounts of retirees and income investors.
The suitability and best interest standards apply to every recommendation. Learn more about investment product due diligence.
Retirees and income-focused investors are most at risk. They were often drawn by high yields and told MLPs were stable. Many could not afford deep losses or sharp cuts in income, and some held MLPs in retirement accounts where the tax rules add complexity.
Older investors have less time to wait out a long energy slump. When a broker steers a senior client into heavy MLP exposure, the conduct may also raise concerns about financial elder abuse.
Investors in other energy products face related issues. See our pages on oil and gas private placements and oil and gas royalty trusts.
The FINRA eligibility rule generally bars claims filed more than six years after the event that caused the dispute. For MLPs, that is often the purchase date. Purchases tied to the 2014 to 2016 crash are now well past six years. State deadlines may also apply.
MLPs are still sold today, and energy markets still swing. More recent purchases may fall within the window.
Our oil and gas MLP lawyers check every purchase date early in a review.
A FINRA panel may consider the money an investor lost, what that money might have earned in suitable investments, interest, and costs. The panel decides which measures fit the facts. No one can say in advance what a panel will award.
Out-of-pocket damages compare what went in with what came back, including distributions. Well-managed account damages ask what the money would have earned in a portfolio that fit the investor's goals and spread risk across sectors.
Account statements, the broker's notes, and the firm's supervision records all shape the arguments our FINRA arbitration attorneys can make.
Gather your account statements, trade confirmations, new account forms, K-1 tax forms, fund prospectuses, and every communication with your broker. These records show what you bought, how much of your portfolio went into energy, and how the investments were described.
New account forms matter a great deal. They list the risk level and goals the broker recorded for you. Those may not match what you told the broker.
Emails, texts, and notes from calls can show whether MLPs were pitched as safe income. If something is missing, the brokerage firm keeps its own records, and many can be requested during discovery.
Our oil and gas MLP lawyers start with the account. How much went into MLPs and other energy holdings, who recommended them, and what were you told? Those answers shape whether a FINRA claim fits and which claims to bring.
Next, our team compares the holdings with your age, goals, and need for income. The review also looks at how concentrated the account became over time.
If the facts support a claim, our FINRA arbitration attorneys draft and file the Statement of Claim. That is the written filing that starts a FINRA case.
Discovery follows. Our team asks for the firm's supervision records, concentration alerts, and the broker's commission data.
If the case reaches a final hearing, our oil and gas MLP lawyers present the evidence and witnesses to the panel. No one can predict how a panel will rule. Our page on FINRA arbitration explains each stage.
Did a broker load your account with energy MLPs or MLP funds as a safe source of income? It may be worth a closer look. A conversation with an oil and gas MLP lawyer can help you understand what options may exist in FINRA arbitration.
Our oil and gas MLP lawyers represent investors, retirees, families, and trusts nationwide. Bring your statements, tax forms, and any messages from your broker. Contact Weltz Law today to talk through what happened.
Our seasonsed attorneys have over 30 years of collective experience, and our committed to protecting investors rights. Call today or contact us through our site.
☎ Call NowFill out the form below or call 877-905-7671 to schedule your free consultation
By Appointment Only
9171 Wilshire Blvd #500
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Attorney Advertising | Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.