



A quasi-money market fund lawyer at Weltz Law represents investors who lost money in "cash alternative" products a broker sold as being as safe as cash. These include ultra-short bond funds, enhanced cash funds, and auction rate securities. When a registered broker misdescribed the risk, the dispute may belong in FINRA arbitration.
Our quasi-money market fund lawyers work inside the FINRA dispute resolution forum on behalf of investors nationwide. FINRA stands for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority. It oversees brokerage firms and runs the arbitration system for most disputes between investors and their brokers.
This page is part of our alternative investment attorney section, within our broader securities lawyer practice.
Our seasonsed attorneys have over 30 years of collective experience, and our committed to protecting investors rights. Call today or contact us through our site.
☎ Call NowA quasi-money market fund is an investment marketed as a near-cash holding but built differently from a true money market fund. It may chase higher yield by holding longer-term, lower-quality, or harder-to-sell assets. That extra yield comes with extra risk, including the risk of losing principal.
Money market funds follow strict rules about what they can own and how long their holdings can last. Those rules are designed to keep the share price steady.
Quasi-money market products follow looser rules or none at all. They may look and feel like cash on a statement. Under the surface, they can behave very differently in a crisis.
The trouble usually starts with a single word: "cash." When a broker calls something a cash alternative, investors tend to hear "safe."
No. Money market mutual funds and cash alternative funds are not FDIC insured. FDIC insurance covers bank deposits, such as savings accounts, CDs, and money market deposit accounts at a bank. An investment fund held at a brokerage firm is not a bank deposit, even if it has "money market" in the name.
This difference confuses many investors. A "money market account" at a bank and a "money market fund" at a brokerage firm sound almost the same. They are not.
Brokerage accounts carry a separate type of protection, through the Securities Investor Protection Corporation. That protection covers missing assets if a brokerage firm fails. It does not cover investment losses.
A broker who suggests a cash alternative fund is insured or guaranteed is giving the investor a false picture.
Brokers have sold several products as safe places to park cash. These include ultra-short bond funds, enhanced cash funds, auction rate securities, and short-term bond funds holding riskier debt. Each offered a little more yield than a money market fund. Each carried risks many investors did not understand.
The main types include:
Each one can make sense in the right setting. None of them is the same as cash.
In 2008, several cash-like products failed investors. A large ultra-short bond fund lost most of its assets, the auction rate securities market froze, and one money market fund broke the buck. Investors who believed their money was as safe as cash learned otherwise.
The Schwab YieldPlus Fund is one example. In 2011, the SEC said Schwab entities described it as "a cash alternative that had only slightly higher risk than a money market fund." The SEC found that description misleading. The fund's assets fell from about $13.5 billion to $1.8 billion over eight months as values dropped and investors pulled out. Schwab neither admitted nor denied the findings.
Auction rate securities froze in early 2008 when the auctions that set their rates stopped working. Investors who were told the securities were as good as cash could not sell them for months or longer.
Even a true money market fund, the Reserve Primary Fund, broke the buck in September 2008. Its share price fell below $1.00 after losses on Lehman Brothers debt. That event showed that even funds built to hold steady can fail under stress.
Brokers may steer clients into quasi-money market products to offer a slightly higher yield. Some also want to keep money in house funds or earn more fees than plain cash would generate. A small bump in yield can look attractive, especially when interest rates are low.
The pitch is simple. "Why sit in cash earning almost nothing? This fund pays a bit more and is nearly as safe."
That second half is where the trouble lies. Extra yield almost always means extra risk. A broker who sells the yield without the risk is telling only half the story.
Some firms also manage their own cash alternative funds. That can create a conflict, because the firm earns fees from its own products.
Quasi-money market fund investors may be able to bring a FINRA claim when a registered broker or firm recommended the product. The claim focuses on the broker's conduct. That can include calling a risky product the same as cash, skipping key risks, or placing money meant for safety into the wrong product.
Investors who park money in cash usually have a reason. They may need it for a home purchase, taxes, medical bills, or monthly living costs. A broker who puts that money at risk without a clear explanation may have made an unsuitable recommendation.
Claims may include unsuitable investment recommendations, misleading information, and failure to supervise. Some firms may also face questions about whether they reviewed the product carefully before offering it. Learn more about investment product due diligence.
Warning signs include a yield noticeably higher than money market funds and a share price that moves from day to day. Holdings of mortgage-backed or lower-rated debt and words like "enhanced" or "plus" in the name are others. A broker who calls it "just like cash" is another red flag.
Check your statements. Does the price per share change? A true money market fund aims to hold at $1.00. A fund whose price drifts is behaving like a bond fund.
Read the fund's fact sheet too. Look at what it holds and how long those holdings last. If the answers include longer-term or lower-rated debt, the fund is not cash.
Retirees, small businesses, and anyone saving for a near-term need are hurt most. They chose cash for safety and quick access. When a cash alternative drops or freezes, they may lose money they were counting on and face real hardship.
Picture a retired couple who sold their home and plan to buy a smaller one in six months. Their broker parks the $400,000 in an "enhanced cash" fund for a little more yield. When credit markets crack, the fund drops 8%. They lose $32,000 they needed for the new home.
When older investors are involved, these sales may also raise concerns about financial elder abuse.
The FINRA eligibility rule generally bars claims filed more than six years after the event that caused the dispute. For cash alternative products, that is often the purchase date. Losses tied to the 2008 crisis are now well outside that window. State deadlines may also apply.
Cash alternatives are still sold today, often under new names. Rising and falling interest rates can still expose their risks.
Our quasi-money market fund lawyers check every purchase date early in a review.
A FINRA panel may consider the money an investor lost, what that money might have earned in suitable investments, interest, and costs. The panel decides which measures fit the facts. No one can say in advance what a panel will award.
Out-of-pocket damages compare what went in with what came back out. Well-managed account damages ask what the money would have earned if it had stayed in a true cash or money market holding.
That comparison is often simple in these cases, because the investor's goal was safety. The broker's statements and the firm's records shape the arguments our FINRA arbitration attorneys can make.
Gather your account statements, trade confirmations, fund fact sheets, prospectuses, and every communication with your broker. These records show what you bought, how it was described, and how the price changed over time.
Statements that list the fund under a "cash" or "cash equivalents" heading can matter a great deal. So can any notes about why you were holding cash in the first place.
Emails, texts, and notes from calls can show whether the product was pitched as being as safe as cash. If something is missing, the brokerage firm keeps its own records, and many can be requested during discovery.
Our quasi-money market fund lawyers start with your goal for the money. Was it meant to stay safe and available? Then our team looks at what the broker recommended and how it was described. Those answers shape whether a FINRA claim fits and which claims to bring.
Next, our team reviews what the product actually held and how its risks compared with a true money market fund.
If the facts support a claim, our FINRA arbitration attorneys draft and file the Statement of Claim. That is the written filing that starts a FINRA case.
Discovery follows. Our team asks for the firm's product review files, marketing materials, and the broker's commission data.
If the case reaches a final hearing, our quasi-money market fund lawyers present the evidence and witnesses to the panel. No one can predict how a panel will rule. Our page on FINRA arbitration explains each stage.
Did a broker put your cash into a product that lost value or froze? It may be worth a closer look. A conversation with a quasi-money market fund lawyer can help you understand what options may exist in FINRA arbitration.
Our quasi-money market fund lawyers represent investors, retirees, families, small businesses, and trusts nationwide. Bring your statements, fund documents, and any messages from your broker. Contact Weltz Law today to talk through what happened.
Our seasonsed attorneys have over 30 years of collective experience, and our committed to protecting investors rights. Call today or contact us through our site.
☎ Call NowFill out the form below or call 877-905-7671 to schedule your free consultation
By Appointment Only
9171 Wilshire Blvd #500
Beverly Hills, CA 90210
Attorney Advertising | Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.